#0472* - TOURNIQUET & BLOOD LETTING for UKIP?
.
.
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!
.
.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
.
.
TOURNIQUET & BLOOD LETTING for UKIP
May Prove The ONLY Answer!!
May Prove The ONLY Answer!!
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Hi,Hi,
may I suggest a spot of detailed reading starting with CLICK HERE
Do note the last part of the posting:
Let us watch wait and see who blinks first!
............Farage has already sent in his Press Office and his puppet chairman - Let Battle Commence:
But I must say I believe the Oxus River was more spectacular and both Sorahb & Rhustum more intriguing :-)
Regards,
Greg_L-W.
For details of Marta Andreasen's Betrayal & its Prediction CLICK HERE
For more information on Marta Andreasen CLICK HERE
To additionally research use >SEARCH< at the top of the Right Hand Side Bar
well back to the plot - it is amusing as the day draws on to see the absence of the venal loud mouths on the relevant Forums as they scuttle hither and yon sheltered behind their cowardly anonymity to work out how best to exploit UKIP, its members and these United Kingdoms for their personal gain and to keep their sordid snouts in the trough.
Silence from the liars and trash like Skeptyk, McGough, Fuller, Independent UKIP, Denny, Agnew, Batten, Bannerman, Reeve, Duffy, Nuttall, Dartmouth, Hogan, Towler, Bloom and the rest of the befouled and besmirched liars, cheats and self serving low lifes.
The connundrum is as earlier explained what were Andreasen's motives in this very public piece of Gesture Politics and for whom besides herself is she doing a knife job on Farage and thus on UKIP?
Andreasen is NOT the key to this situation, though she may believe she is - she is merely looking to her own gain with all the integrity she has displayed to date!!!
One wonders just how awake the poor old Stuart Wheeler is in this whole affair or is this now his 'Crisis of Confidence'.
A statement of support made within 24 hours by Wheeler may well save Farage.
Farage must look to the support of those loyal to UKIP MEPs Nikki Sinclaire, Mike Nattrass and Trevor Colman for his survival and IF he can get their support and undertakes to distance UKIP from the racist, xenophobia, anti Judaism and violent anti homosexuality as espoused by his pro EU membership Reformist EFD Group
AND
Permit the eviceration of the layer of parasites and funded praise singers and parasites
THEN & ONLY THEN
Does Farage and UKIP stand any realistic chance of any kind of meaningful survival.
A FURTHER KEY
that has largely been overlooked is Douglas Denny who holds the written evidence and proofs of where bodies are buried and the fraud that was the Ashford scam - IF he releases this or IF he has been stupid enough to put it in the hands of David Bannerman then days are numbered.
Farage may be UKIP's only asset of note but we must also remember that is by his design having fiddled and rigged every election within the party in one way or another - having deliberately and publicly set out to humiliate his own supporters in the media - he has ensured that no one of any merit has been allowed or willing to survive anywhere near a single lever of power.
Denny may be a fool but he was an exploited fool and like many of his ilk IF the worm turns clearly he is in a position to issue a toxic bite and thus destroy Farage and sadly thus UKIP with just one blow.
Farage has not one single solitary individual who he can trust - in that he bought each of them and in that he knows each of them to be corrupt - Farage's only reliable help can ONLY come from Sinclaire, Colman, Nattrass and his open critics - they have shown their integrity.
IF Farage can manage to survive until the end of The Strasburgh week which is lunchtime on Thursday then UKIP and Farage will survive but deeply wounded and his only hope is to distance himself from the poison he has gathered around him to prevent the wounds becoming infected and a slow and humiliating death.
THERE IS A SOLUTION
A choice that can strengthen UKIP and empower Farage - but it does look like only one that will work where all else will exacerbate the problems.
10 May 2011 Last updated at 13:49
Call for UKIP's Nigel Farage to resign as double act turns sour
To view the original article CLICK HEREShe was brought in as the 'budget buster'. As a constant thorn in the side of the Euro establishment, former EU Chief Accountant Marta Andreasen seemed an ideal recruit for the UK Independence Party.In the European elections in the South East of England she and Nigel Farage finished ahead of Labour and the Liberal Democrats with nearly 20% of the vote.But now the double act has turned very sour.Calling for her party leader's resignation. Ms Andreasen says they made a "dismal" showing in the local elections.Dismal showing"Party members and supporters are justifiably angry. After promises of success and claims that the party would triple the number of its seats, after large amounts of party members' and donors' money was spent on what was a poorly led campaign, the result was frankly dismal."I am calling on him to step down as Leader of UKIP and make room for a new Leader who resonates more with the public and who will move us forward to where I know we should be."It is time for change. Mr Farage has abjectly failed to deliver and is not leading the party on the course to victory. Even he must recognise this fact."But he certainly doesn't recognise that, at all. Though he didn't want to comment to me directly, it's clear this is down to a personality clash as much as electoral success or failure.She resigned as party treasurer after arguments with Paul Nuttall, then party chairman. And there has been continued disagreement about UKIP's position within the European Parliament. Ms Andreasen admitted she had not put her points to Mr Farage personally, but says he's very aware of her position.UKIP reactionThe party dismissed Ms Andreasen's call for the leader's resignation as "eccentric and naive"."I'm frankly astonished that Nigel's fellow South East MEP, Marta Andreasen, has issued this statement. It is quite odd, and based on a complete misreading of the political situation in the UK," said UKIP Executive Chairman Steve Crowder."In last Thursday's elections UKIP made net gains, and more than doubled our votes in areas where we had stood before. We established ourselves clearly as the fifth party in Wales, and made our presence felt in Northern Ireland and Scotland, as well as in over 1,200 council seats around England.""Marta's statement displays what one might perhaps charitably call a naivety in its analysis of the UK electoral scene. I am intrigued to know who she believes would be the "new Leader who resonates more with the public" than Nigel?"Golden girl“Start Quote
End Quote Peter HenleyWhen she was first introduced at their conference in Bournemouth, I remember Nigel himself introduced her as their new golden girl - the UKIP equivalent of a then ascendant Sarah Palin.”It was Nigel Farage himself who brought Marta Andreasen, a Spanish national, into the party - and helped her take the number two spot on the list for the South East region.When she was first introduced at their conference in Bournemouth, I remember Nigel himself introduced her as their new golden girl - the UKIP equivalent of a then ascendant Sarah Palin.But now his running mate is in open conflict. The same situation he was in in the last term, when Ashley Mote was elected and then thrown out of the party for benefit fraud.So is this just a personality clash, or is there substance to the complaints of a "dismal" showing in the local elections?One-man band?It is true that UKIP made net gains in the election - but it must have been less than the party had hoped for.In some councils such as Eastleigh in Hampshire they contested every seat up for election, but won none.Aylesbury Vale in Oxfordshire bucked the trend, with two candidates winning seats from Liberal Democrats on a platform of opposition to the high-speed train plan HS2.There will be some within UKIP who agree with Marta Andreasen's comments, some who agree that Nigel Farage is too much of a one-man band. But the timing is not good.He was only re-elected in November after standing aside for Lord Pearson, who didn't exactly cover himself with glory.The membership overwhelming voted for Farage, backing him with 60% of the vote to closest rival Professor Tim Congdon on 20%.But this may be the sting the party needs to continue its reorganisation.
10 May 2011 Last updated at 08:56
See the original article CLICK HERE UKIP rejects post-election call for leader Farage to go
The UK Independence Party (UKIP) has rejected calls by one of its MEPs for leader Nigel Farage to stand down after it failed to make a breakthrough in English council elections.The party made no net gains despite Mr Farage suggesting beforehand that it could double its 19 councillors.
Marta Andreasen said Mr Farage had "abjectly failed" and should go.
But the party said he had been elected as leader six months before with the highest ever share of the party vote.
Before last week's elections Mr Farage had suggested the party was on course for "significant gains" but, as it was, it secured just seven seats of those up for election - no improvement on four years before.
'Angry'Ms Andreasen, a former European Commission chief accountant who was sacked in 2004 after she claimed the EU budget was open to fraud and abuse, said the results were a "bitter disappointment".
Continue reading the main story“Start Quote
End Quote Marta Andreasen UKIP MEPMr Farage has abjectly failed to deliver and is not leading the party on the course to victory”"Party members and supporters are justifiably angry," she said."After promises of success and claims that the party would triple the number of its seats, after large amounts of party members and donors money was spent on what was a poorly led campaign, the result was frankly dismal."
The blame for the party's performance must rest with its leadership, not activists or candidates, she added.
"Mr Farage has abjectly failed to deliver and is not leading the party on the course to victory," she said.
"I am calling on him to step down as leader of UKIP and make room for a new leader who resonates more with the public and who will move us forward to where I know we should be."
Miss Andreasen has clashed with senior UKIP figures in the past and in 2009 quit as its treasurer after disagreements with the party chairman.
More votesA UKIP spokesman described the row with Mr Farage as an "internal party matter" that would be dealt with in an appropriate fashion.
"She has her opinion and she is entitled to that but it is not one shared by the majority of the party," he said.
He pointed out that Mr Farage had been overwhelmingly re-elected as party leader in November - his second stint in the job.
"I don't believe the party is going to think we have had it with him."
UKIP sources pointed out that while its performance in the English local elections was not "startling", the party had secured more votes than in any previous local election and had come second in more wards than ever before.
The party came second to the Conservatives at the 2009 European Parliament elections but it has never done well in town hall elections.
It had poured more resources - and candidates - into Thursday's contest in the hope of capitalising on strong performances in recent Westminster by-elections.
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 - 62 65 62
No comments:
Post a Comment
Due to Spam & the offensive comments of many seeking to support UKIP corruption in a cloak of anonymity full moderation applies. This blog is designed to bring to light the actions of UKIP's leadership and their claque and show they are unfit for purpose on almost every discernible count.
The blog is based on supported facts, accurate quotes, substantiated details and as shon my opinion and that of others quoted!
By all means comment in your own name it will probably be published if you avoid foul and abusive language!