Hi,
I gather
there was an injunction of some sort placed upon the information IN The Court
relative to the allegations of racism etc. made against Gerard Batten - which
clearly no one who was not actually in the Court would have known about.
The Court
itself willingly provided certain details when phoned by members of the public
which can be shown.
With
regard to information published by Junius and myself regarding Gerard Batten's
behaviour firstly there was no reason to believe that any kind of injunction was
being used to suppress the facts as shown by the fact that the
industrial/employment tribunals when John Whittacker was found guilty and also
when the verdict of guilty handed down against UKIP, Nigel Farage and Godfrey
Bloom took place - no such suppression of the truth was imposed.
Similarly
when Lisa Duffy lied to the Court for UKIP as when Paul Nuttall lied on Anthony Butcher's
UKIP controlled blog and also when he was officially censured by The Data
Protection Commissioner.
There were
also no restrictions on reporting when UKIP effectively lost their case against
me when Mark Croucher acted against me when in UKIP employ supported by Paul Nuttall and Clive Page in Court
who all three held positions working for UKIP leadership.
You will
also note that although The Court issued an order for payment in my favour
neither UKIP nor Mark Croucher had the integrity to honour the Courts and owe
me a considerable sum of money morally running to over £12,500 which they have
to date defaulted on.
With
regard to whether the complaint that led to the strange removal of the facts
from Junius was made by Gerard Batten or Gregory Lauder-Frost or someone acting on their behalf
seems immaterial as clearly both parties have endeavoured to suppress the truth
about them and reasonable comment in the past and have a track record of what
many consider to be extremism and I believe can easily be seen as incitement to
racial hatred be that based on ethnicity or superstition.
Fortunately
it will be noted that neither Junius nor I were aware of any suppression of the
truth to protect Gerard Batten and neither of us acted willfully against a
Court diktat as neither of us reported on the supposedly confidential facts put
forward in the Court but merely reported the facts in the public domain.
Interestingly
you will note that if you read Junius' blog elsewhere in The EU it is clearly
visible uncensored!
Obviously
had Gerard Batten had any complaint legitimate or perceived he has had every
opportunity to make contact with me for either a right of reply on my blog or
if he could show that one word of what I published was false he could
reasonably have asked for it to be corrected.
It does
rather look as if Gerard Batten or his associates are seemingly trumping up
issues in a desperate attempt to suppress the truth and maliciously and
vindictively suppress reasonable reportage of their odious activity.
Police
State that we seem increasingly to be governed by presumably it is still
acceptable under free speech to tell the truth and to state and discuss
opinions!
Gerard
Batten has loudly proclaimed his support for the right of free speech of Julian
Assange of Wikileaks - just as associates of his have been willing to give
support to Anders Brevik and apart from mere words' of no consequence or value
no one in UKIP leadership took action against those supporting Anders Brevik -
a sad reflection UKIP, Gerard Batten and their racist, anti homosexual,
Holocaust denying, anti Jewish associates.
Many will
remember the vile tract published by Anthony Bennett of UKIP whilst working for
Jeffrey Titford (leader of UKIP), the vile attack on Muslims of the award
winning Zionist Malcolm Pearson (leader of UKIP), The exploitation and people
trafficking of Poles by Roger Knapman & family (leader of UKIP) and of
course the odious tract put in the public domain by Gerard Batten regarding his
antipathy to Islam believed to be influenced by his personal superstitions and
maybe also the fact that his Filipino wife is most probably a Catholic - it
will be known by the informed that there is great animus between the Catholics
and The Muslims in the Philippines!
Presumably
the verdict of the Court on Gerard Batten's alleged racism etc. will be made
known shortly, just as were the details that the case was taking place which
were readily available direct from the Court by phone!
If Gerard
Batten actually believes in what many see as his extremist behaviour and
associates and his apparently overt willingness to seemingly spread racial
hatred based upon his choice of superstitions and beliefs one wonders why he
wishes to suppress the discussion of his views!
To avoid
ANY misunderstandings - I was not only unaware but clearly there was no reason
to be aware that Gerard Batten had or had sought any type of suppression order
to suppress reporting of the facts.
Further
please note I did NOT report any comments or facts that I had any reason to
believe were not in the public domain.
It is also
my opinion that this entire issue is a trumpped up and thus dishonest situation
as Gerard Batten took absolutely no steps to contact me or to contact Junius
through me to seek correction or inform us he had some sort of suppression
order to prevent reporting of the facts.
May I
remind readers that Gerard Batten is a public servant and it would seem he is
acting in abuse of his position in seemingly inciting racial hatred based u8pon
his chosen superstitions.
The day
that it is unlawfull to discuss the actual behaviour of public servants will be
a sad day for these United Kingdoms and to
note YET AGAIN UKIP seeking to suppress the truth and act against
freedom of speech upholding EU diktats and Political Correctness is possibly
the ultimate hypocracy.
With
regard to the idiotic comments of UKIP supporters repeatedly claiming that I am
mad and that no one reads Junius' or my blog and that the facts we present are
untrue - how come they spend so much time reading our blogs and attacking us?
The number
of readers is to me utterly irrelevant, on my blogs - I post them as an archive
record of facts and my opinions on those facts.
It is the
caliber of the readers which is of consequence!
Regards,
Greg_L-W.
. .
. Re-TWEET my Twitterings 
Originally Posted by Steve Morson
Reply With Quote
