.
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!
Ah Bless!!
Next a spokesman for UKIP will claim the Tory staffer the liar & bully Peter Reeve has electoral insight and the Mare of Ramsay is a better ride for being his doxy!
May 2010: This site replaced http://CaterpillarsAndButterflies.blogspot.com now an Archive! As is this site NEW MATERIAL: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com To view other details, contacts, caveats and more see: http://GregLanceWatkins.blogspot.com
Thx Steve. I look at comparative statistics. You only get 92% approval votes in dictatorships. I don't think you can maintain the ERS is too expensive without quoting your evidence.
I note your conclusions re UKIP are the same as mine. That is why I describe it as EUKIP to capture its deeply undemocratic control by the Cabal
So where do us Leave-The-EU people go now?
Eric
Hi,
sadly UKIP has a clear and undeniable track record of fiddling internal elections, and thus regardless of Steve Allison's offensive rejoinder.
May I suggest people study the abuse of the internet by extremist UKIP staff such as the odious and utterly dishonest Mark Croucher, who passed on details of UKIP members to his criminal chums at the anti democratic Searchlight organisation. Also note the official censures of UKIP by The Data Protection Commission.
I appreciate there are those who were and are on the payroll and seeking preferment on the gravy train who have and do lie about UKIP for personal gain.
One need only consider Nigel's right hand, Ms. Annabelle Fuller the foul mouthed liar who helped rig one of UKIP's elections.
Steve Allison must be describing the deficiency of Farage's testese or perhaps his own - Clearly his statement is wrong, untrue, unsound and dishonest!
One need only consider the liar and cheat Mick McGough and his criminal offensive spamming and serial dishonesty and corruption to PROVE Steve Allison's claims to be false.
Just look at the caliber of the self seekers on The NEC and the lack of ethics of those who remain as UKIP MEPs.
Perhaps someone can cite an example, outside of dictatorships & the third world, where a 92% vote is considered plausible - the only mitigation being that the ONLY publicity on the imposition of the new dictatorial and centralised Constitution was staggeringly dishonest - little wonder that UKIP completely reversed its vote when last this undemocratic concept was put forward.
Clearly 92% return from the claimed membership list is in itself far from plausible, let alone that they ALL voted in favour of an EU style centralised dictatorship - Even going so far as to use The EU's corrupt methods of if you don't get the result you want represent the question and bully the victims to vote agai.n
May I suggest a perusal of Nigel Farage's various speeches in Ireland condemning the very methods he has chose to use for his own personal gain.
Sadly Steve Allison seems to be easily duped!
Regards,
Greg_L-W.
Due to Spam & the offensive comments of many seeking to support UKIP corruption in a cloak of anonymity full moderation applies. This blog is designed to bring to light the actions of UKIP's leadership and their claque and show they are unfit for purpose on almost every discernible count.
The blog is based on supported facts, accurate quotes, substantiated details and as shon my opinion and that of others quoted!
By all means comment in your own name it will probably be published if you avoid foul and abusive language!
For someone who claims to know what is going on in UKIP you are showing remarkable ignorance of the truth with this report. Your initial premise that I am lying since I'm a UKIP "staffer" falls straight away since I have never been employed by UKIP directly but always as a self employed consultant retained for specific assignements and indeed have not held any paid position within UKIP for nearly 2 years. I'm not even a member of the party any more! So do please try to get at least some facts correct in your rants about UKIP. This is not the first time you have made false statements about me and shows your claim to base your blog only on "supported facts" to be just another of your innacurate statements.
ReplyDeleteHi,
ReplyDeleteas those who know me would expect - I have published your post as soon as I noted it. Inaccurate as it is.
Where above in my 'report' (sic)did I say you ARE a UKIP staffer and that you were you have made most clear, be that as a contract of employ or employment by contract is just fiddling with words on your part.
You will remember that I posted in detail when you resigned and also when you quit UKIP NEC and also when you chose to stand for another little party locally to you.
Do explain where you believe my comments about you were inaccurate, if you can find any and of course they will be corrected if you can substantiate your claims.
I stand by my comments on you based upon veritas - that I MAY have been misinformed by two or more people leading to the posting it is and always has been open to correction if I have made the slightest of errors.
I does seem my coverage of you has been accurate though I had not previously thought you to be a liar willing to lie in an attempt to defame me.
Clearly your dishonesty and gratuitous abuse speaks volumes of how untrustworthy you are. How unfortunate!
Regards,
Greg_L-W.