#0059* - UKIP ETHICAL POLITICS & THE SUPREME COURT

#0059* - UKIP ETHICAL POLITICS & THE SUPREME COURT 

Clean EUkip up NOW  &  make UKIP electable!
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership,   
their anti UKIP claque in POWER &  the NEC
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

UKIP - ETHICAL POLITICS & THE SUPREME COURT
As UKIP AIDS The EU OVERTHROW BRITISH JUSTICE!

Hi,

it would seem there is absolutely nothing that UKIP can do ethically and even worse - not content with failing to move UKIP one inch closer to the exit from the EU under Nigel Farage's leadership they have formed their own Pan EU Political Party EFD grouping which gathers together some of the most unpleasant and overt racists, anti Jewish, holocaust deniers, Nazi supporters and sexually intollerant criminal abusers in EU politics who want to support membership of The EU.

They then put Nigel Farage in the chair and we are told they are in the group for the money.

I understand the black prostitute who escorted Godfrey Bloom to a cash point was in it for the money, but that seems not to have crossed his mind when he tried to run off without paying! For more details CLICK HERE

Hypocracy is a main theme in UKIP - that is clear though for the life of me I find it hard to differentiate between hypocracy and outright dishonesty!

Many will remember that I backed Nigel Farage in all aspects and openly stated that as a supporter of many years standing I would continue to back him for as long as he never stood for leadership, in which case I would relentlessly oppose him - it was clear to me that Nigel Farage lacked the OQ, the integrity, the probity, the gravitas and any leadership skills - it is now clear to anyone but a fool that I was right!

Openly he forms vile groups and is like a badly behaved child an endless embarrassment yet for The Party keeping this performing monkey in the lime light has proved catastrophic as clearly the higher up the tree the monkey climbs the more you see its Rs.

The entire debacle with the Electoral Commission was ABSOLUTELY in line with my predictions - he has gathered around him such a claque of low grad trash as his NEC and MEPs that there is absolutely no one of caliber who can recognise the dangers and pitfalls whilst inflating bulldozers, dressing up as chickens, standing in APCs on trailers and pretending they are tanks, rushing around in a 1950s scout car out of a meuseum, standing in puddles on building sites, and endlessly making foolish insults just don't hack it for a political party but do much for Farage's personal promotion.

Having deliberately forced a confrontation with the Electoral Commission in the Courts, that was completely avoidable, and having risked the entire future of UKIP - we now find they were utterly dependent on the irrefutable fact that Charles Dickens was spot on when he gave Mr. Bumble when he said:

'The Law is an Ass, an Idiot'.

I QUOTE:

UKIP would repeal the Human Rights Act 1998 and withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. In future the British courts would not be allowed to appeal to any international treaty or convention to override or set aside the provisions of any statue passed by Parliament.

Some interesting comments from one of the legal blogs:

The Supreme Court has narrowly held that the UK Independence Party (UKIP) can keep nearly all of a £349,216 donation despite the donor not being a permissible donor at the time of receipt, contrary to party funding rules under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.

The Supreme Court upheld an order originally made at the City of Westminster Magistrates Court to the effect that the party only had to give back a small proportion of the money. UKIP will now only have to forfeit £14,481, rather than the full amount. According to the BBC, this will save the party from financial ruin. We will have more detail on the decision, which was by a narrow 4-3 majority, soon. In the meantime, the Supreme Court press summary can be found here, and is reproduced below.

 The original of which can be seen if you CLICK HERE

For those of you looking for more information on last week’s Supreme Court judgment on UKIP party funding (see our previous post), we have been sent an interesting analysis of the judgment from Lucy Colter at Four New Square Chambers.

Patrick Lawrence Q.C. and Can Yeginsu, also of Four New Square, appeared for UKIP. The judgment was only of tangential importance in respect of human rights, but Coulter addresses this towards the end of her article. The main point was that a court in future would have leeway as to how much it could order a party to forfeit. As such, the court was satisfied that the party funding legislation is sufficiently flexible so as not to contravene human rights law:

Lord Phillips also dealt very briefly (and almost in passing) with the Appellant’s subsidiary contention on the basis of Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights, and agreed that total forfeiture should not be ordered in circumstances where it was a disproportionate sanction, as this would breach the Convention. The strongest dissent on this point was from Lord Brown, who was “at a loss to see” how forfeiture of a donation which by definition the party should not have accepted or kept could violate its human rights. Even if it could, “the court always has the option – and on that hypothesis would be bound – to make no forfeiture order at all.” But again this leaves the circumstances in which a court would not make an order at all very shadowy, and would provide a court with no guidance as to when the exercise the discretion undoubtedly contained in the word “may”.

To view the original of this article which so clearly highlights UKIP's unarguable hypocricy CLICK HERE

UKIP's hypocracy is unacceptable, sordid, underhand and shamefull - sheltering behind the skirts of The EU from British Justice - evenignoring the ruling of the British appeal Courts who stated there were no legal or ethical grounds under British Law to appeal to The House of Lords - so what does UKIP under Farage do, and I always said he lacked both honour and OQ, but they dash off to seek to shelter behind the EU' Human Rights Laws they had expressly stated they would ban as a part of their Manifesto PLEDGE.

Further they were all too willing to pour salt in the wound of our Justice system and raise two fingers to Britain's appeal Courts and the House of Lords as they strutted off to lend greater legitimacy to The EUropean Union's corruption of British Justice by surplanting it with an EU Regional Supreme Court to be compliant with the rest of The EU and to inexorably and inevitably advance the demise of Justice in these United Kingdoms and our legal system founded on Natural Law and presumptions of innocence in trial before a Jury of one's peers under Habeas Corpus and the principles of No Double Jeopardy and the concept that Justice Delayed is Justice Denied.

Farage's UKIP has much aided, for their own squalid gain, the advance of the imposition of the Justinian codex of Law of Corpus Juris with its overlay of Code Napoleon - another step towards the destruction of the values of these United Kingdoms and the concepts and belief in Justice - a most  execution by Farage & UKIP for their own gain!

A measure of the assistance Farage's UKIP has given The EU by their total and shamefull abrogation of honour and duty as they defined for themselves in their own manifesto is shown in this legal comment:

Increasingly muscular Supreme Court good for human rights

 The UK’s new Supreme Court has reached the end of its first term, leading to some interesting discussions about its future from both practical and philosophical perspectives. From a human rights angle, a well-tooled and robust Supreme Court which acts to keep the government in check is good for everyone. 

On a practical level, the UK Supreme Court Blog has posted on the stark warning from the UKSC’s chief executive, Jenny Rowe, to the effect that the Government’s proposed budget cuts could cripple the new court after only a year in operation. The UKSC Blog reports that Jenny Rowe, the court’s Chief Executive, has said she is not sure where the axe will fall but that “since casework (i.e. the hearing and determination of appeals) was the Court’s “priority“, it would be the Court’s public education and outreach programmes that would be most vulnerable.“

For more details of The EU Regional Supreme Court Case CLICK HERE

As I have ALWAYS said, since my first involvement with UKIP some 14 years ago - I am a devoted backer of the principles and ethics of UKIP and would back Nigel Farage to the hilt as the party's performing monkey but would oppose him totally if he ever stood for leader as he has absolutely no principles and is a mere barrow boy without attributes to lead - at the moment UKIP has no ethics and is without principles and just look at the filth and the scum it has gathered around it.

You can find a copy of the extremely dubious judgement of the supreme clowns:
CLICK HERE
and for the summary: CLICK HERE
and for The Electoral Commission's Press Release CLICK HERE

We know that even in the days of the medieval foundations of law they had an understanding of it:

 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

to

Reclaim YOUR Future 
& 
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate)

LEAVE-THE-EU  
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
  & 
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK