Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
NOTE WHAT FLOATS IN UKIP's SEPTIC TANK!
A MONKEY IN SILK IS A MONKEY NO LESS!
EVEN IN A STUPID STRIPEY JACKET AS A COMEDY FREAK!
FARAGE HAS NOW REALISED THAT STUNT OR NO STUNT
NO ONE CARES IF HE NEVER COMES BACK AS
CLEARLY THE HIGHER UP THE TREE THE MONKEY
CLIMBED - THE MORE WE SAW ITS Rs!
It would almost feature as one of Croucher/Skeptic and their chums blogs - it reads almost as a work of malign and dishonest drivel, just like their blogs (though I'm running on hearsay - I just don't have time to read their lies)
They are crassly amateur as we know crammed with childish unfunny comments and clear banality.
If you want to see the works of professional nutters track down a chap called Paul Drockton or Robert Green they really are dangerous nutters.
That is not to say UKIP, as it slides further into obscurity and irrelevance are NOT dangerous.
Just look at the efforts put in by poor old Nigel, who increasingly does not look as if he will be coming back to politics and has cancelled all his appointments. I gather he is FAR worse damaged than anyone is letting on and Gawain Towler actually told one of my media contacts that he was really quite ill and in bed most of the time.
I can understand this and I've seen men who have been trained and competent crack up and never recover after a trauma.
Nigel is a classic louche lounge lizard, a drunk, heavy smoker who never did manage to work out the difference between Libertarian and Libertine.
I would be glad never to see him in politics again as he is such a dishonest and corrupt pratt, who has done huge damage to the EUroRealist movement and almost destroyed EUroScepticism with his childish stunts and me, me, me serial failures.
That said I do not wish him personal ill and hope he makes a speedy recovery but this time to something he can do because after the French Bank fired him for his unreliability and incompetence and his Father bailed him out he never really made it as a barrow boy in the City and the few who do remember him haven't a good word to say of him - he was a failure, in the boom!
Let us hope he is upto getting a job at something he is capable of and if he decides a pub would be a good idea don't fopr heavens sake listen to the serial failure Mark Croucher who can't even pay his Court Orders CLICK HERE
Don't forget that at one time I was Nigel Farage's ONLY friend who had not bought!
Every man Jack of the slippery little s**ts slithered back under their stones when he was exposed in a double page spreadby the News of the World in a drunken orgy with a prostitute who he didn't even remember to pay! No wonder she sold her story to the NoTW, I'll bet she got more than her going rate from the punters she picked up in Nigel's local pub! It was not the only time she hustled pay DIRT. Where were alll his so called friends then?
Vanished the whole guttles sewer full of them leaving me as the ONLY person willing to step in and try and bail him out, aided by Daniel Foggo - the weak self serving little man never had the OQ to thank either of us. It is times like that you know a man is trash!
That is not for a moment to wish a little nobody like Farage ill, he isn't evil he is just stupid and without any competence other than that of a performing monkey whose last stupid stunt went wrong.
IF you want to confront evil join with me in trying, yet again to expose the perverts who exploit the disabled and children either for sexual gratification or agrandisement people like Paul Drockton, Brian Gerrish, Robert Green, Sandra Barr, Ian McFarlan and many more I have exposed - do YOU think the childish antics of the failures in UKIP concern me - I can't even be bothered reading their pathetic dribblings unless someone 'e'Mails them to be - there must be 50 or more web sites in cyber space crammed full of lies and fantasies about me - why would I care?
Yes the vile behaviour of the likes of Denny, McGough, Croucher, Skeptic, Independent UKIP, Baron Failure, Butcher, Shaun Parr and their odious ilk are risible and implausible. They do however do huge damage to UKIP as on occasion someone intelligent looks at UKIP's site and most days the Journalists and competitors pore over my sites to find easy pickings for a story.
How can the systemic and endemic dishonesty, lies and bullying of anyone who dares to have a different view be seen as anything but destructive for UKIP. A party that has confused Libertine for Libertarian and is so rigidly authoritarian it will not publish its MEP's accounts, it employs a rag assed beggar who can't pay his bills like Croucher a revolting dishonest pervert like Gawain Towler.
There is the sordid spectacle of UKIP aligned with the BNP with Mark Croucher forced to do the intro, as the press officer for these slime because Farage who was listed as speaker and Bloom also just didn't pitch up - Farage had a good excuse but on past record I expect Bloom was too drunk.
So Mark Croucher assisted a criminal from the UKIP EFD to introduce a poorly presented and downright pig ignorant presentation of a new theory on the Bilderbergs placing The Plague of the Middle Ages at the door of The Illuminati and a host of other fanciful drivel that acted to undermine what valid message Croucher's conspiracy theorist chums have dreamed up. Surely he would have been far better suited to slithering on his belly like a lizard, or was he there to represent the rats that ACTUALLY spread the fleas that spread The Plague from Asia.
Many of you will remember the huge efforts Croucher made with Farage to raise the profile of TheBNP to enhance their chances of getting their two 'also rans' as MEPs - and to be fair the two of them have done considerably more than UKIP in terms of work in the 360 days they have been there. Well what has UKIP done besides a few Jollies, some overseas jaunts and lie to the Courts, defraud the tax payers and money launder - not much else in this 12 month period.
OK argue by all means but PRECISELY how have the 12 MEPs earned the approximate £15,000,000 they have cost - are we £1.50 closer to the exit let alone £15M. A catastrophic General Election where the BNP beat them in most of the seats they stood against them and even The Greens got a seat in the Westminster Parliament.
UKIP's results were catastrophic and their leadership was just a laugh a minute and when you thought it couldn't get worse they bring in a fake Lord & commedy act the ridiculous Christopher Monkton (He would be stuffed if he couldn't steal his facts from Dr. Richard North and Watts Up With That. The man is not JUST a fraud but a fool to boot!
It isn't even a matter of whether he is right or wrong it is the ease that he can be utterly evicerated:
Ukip: Science test results
We challenged the main political parties to answer questions about their science policies posed by prominent scientists including Ben Goldacre, Simon Singh and Petra Boynton. Here Martin Robbins analyses the responses from Ukip, the UK Independence Party
Ukip, the self-styled "party of the pub", is fielding 500 candidates in next week's general election in an attempt to capitalise on gains made at elections for the European parliament last year, although polling suggests the Eurosceptic party is unlikely to make a breakthrough in Westminster.
Not particularly noted for its progressive views, the party performed badly in our European election assessment last year, having adopted a policy of climate change denial that puts it at odds with the scientific community and has seen Ukip MEPs engage in a series of rants on the subject in the European parliament.
And that's just the start of the party's problems.
Ukip's manifesto contains a series of bizarre policy announcements on science, ranging from a rejection of the Commons Science and Technology Select Committee's findings on homeopathy, to a series of statements about "climate extremists".
The Met Office comes in for particular scrutiny, with an odd pledge to link funding to the accuracy of its forecasts. Given that Met Office forecasts are generally considered to be among the best in the world and improving, that may not have the desired outcome.
On the plus side, Ukip has presented a drugs policy more progressive than some, and is reasonably committed to environmental protection, if occasionally misguided on the issue.
Viscount Monckton provided the answers to our questions – a surprising choice as spokesperson for its science policy considering he has so little credibility in the scientific community.
Brian Cox: Science funding
Do you plan to maintain Britain's science budget below the European average?
Ukip's innovative approach to science funding is to set up a Royal Commission to investigate climate change in a court of law, and immediately cancel all funding "connected with 'global warming'" pending its outcome, thus wresting the science budget from the hands of "rapacious extremists".
It is a policy that places Ukip squarely in the realm of fantasy.
Since just about every national and international scientific institution on Earth accepts the evidence of humanity's impact on the climate, such a commission would almost inevitably conclude in science's favour. Ukip doesn't explain what it would do in the event of that outcome, having already crippled scientific research into potentially one of the greatest problems facing humanity this century.
Ukip claims that the Royal Commission would allow scientists to "reach a conclusion" on climate change. The problem is that scientists reached a conclusion decades ago, and research shouldn't be halted on the basis that Ukip's members are incapable of keeping up with it, or don't like its findings.
Even if a Royal Commission were set up as Ukip would like, it seems unlikely the party would listen to the results, given statements such as:
"The correct policy approach to the non-problem of 'global warming' is to have the courage to do nothing"
These are not the words of a party that is particularly open-minded about the outcome.
Combined with its stated determination to destroy any institution or apparatus connected with solving the problem before a commission even reports, the impression given is of a party staffed by people who are far from rational.
If the balance of evidence suggests that a treatment does not perform any better than placebo, should it be supported by the NHS?
"The placebo effect is not fully understood, and should not be dismissed in favour of 'scientific' proof. If it works, it should be supported by the NHS ('mind over matter' etc.)"
Ukip has performed a U-turn over alternative medicine in the past year. Ahead of the European elections, its spokesman Tim Worstall was happy to declare, quite sensibly, that alternative medicines should be required to satisfy clinical trials and be regulated just like any other medicines.
In contrast, Monckton's response to this question, that the placebo effect "should not be dismissed in favour of 'scientific' proof", was confused. Science doesn't dismiss the placebo effect.
The rejection in Ukip's manifesto of the Commons Science and Technology Select Committee's detailed report on homeopathy is not explained, but if the party believes that it has evidence of the efficacy of homeopathy that the rest of us have not seen, then perhaps it would care to share it with the world.
Simon Singh: Libel reform
What will your party do to reduce the chilling effect of our libel laws on science? Currently there is no statutory public interest defence, so scientists risk running the gauntlet of London's High Court if they publish material they believe to be in the public interest, but that a major corporation or litigious charlatan believes to be libellous.
Monckton's original response was a resounding "no", but a further response from the press office clarified things, suggesting a personal lack of familiarity with this issue on the part of its science spokesman.
It seems Ukip is against the idea of a public interest defence, but would like to see the costs of libel law reduced. The problem, of course, is that this combination would make it even easier for companies to bring lawsuits like the one filed against Peter Wilmshurst, who is being sued for criticising a company's research findings at an academic conference.
Open debate is the cornerstone of science, and Ukip does not appear particularly committed to preserving it.
Should nuclear power be part of our country's strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions? How soon can we bring new plants online?
"UKIP has been calling for a rational, balanced approach to the climate debate since 2008, when extensive manipulation of scientific data first became clear"
The nature of this "extensive manipulation of scientific data" is unclear, but it seems Ukip's policymakers have spent a bit too much time surfing conspiracy sites on the internet.
Meanwhile, Britain's energy demands will be met by commissioning "enough fossil-fuelled and nuclear power stations to meet demand," which is fairly straightforward, although neither costed nor elaborated upon in Ukip's manifesto.
David Nutt: Drugs policy
To what extent should drug policy be based on scientific evidence? What evidence, if any, would you require to declassify a drug?
Ukip's drugs policy is somewhat more liberal than that of the present government. A distinction would be made between medical use and recreational use, with restrictions placed on the sale and marketing of drugs for the latter. The severity of the restriction would, unlike the present system, be based on scientific evidence.
Petra Boynton: Public health campaigns
How will your party ensure public health/education campaigns are underpinned by evidence, and how will you evaluate their success?
On the one hand, Ukip believes that public health policy should be informed by a "mature evaluation" of the scientific evidence. On the other, it disputes the results of such evaluations, with Monckton responding to this question by declaring that campaigns to reduce salt intake are based on "the medico-scientific community who have whipped up unjustifiable fears". The problem, again, is that while Ukip is happy to talk about evidence, it dismisses the evidence that is presented to it.
Genetic engineering/Stem cell research
Should Britain be at the forefront of research in these areas? What benefits do you believe such research will bring for society?
Monckton's answer to this was rather quirky:
"Wherever stem cells can be obtained by means other than the killing of very small children, it is ethical only to obtain the stem cells by means that do not involve the loss of little lives."
I can only assume that this is a reference to embryonic stem cells. They are generally obtained from surplus IVF embryos, rather than by killing very small children.
Ben Goldacre: Pharmaceutical regulation
Do you believe pharmaceutical companies should be forced to publish all the research data they have on the potential benefits and harms of drugs they manufacture?
"All scientists, whether in pharmaceutical, climatic or other research, should be required to archive all of the material on which they base their results, and to disclose all material known to them but not already in the public domain that may have a bearing on their results."
This is a reasonably sensible policy, with some caveats. First, it is important to recognise that not all data can be published for a variety of reasons such as licensing issues, commercial confidentiality, data protection, patient confidentiality and so on.
In addition, some datasets, in genome research for example, are simply too large for conventional web servers, PCs and storage media to handle.
Second, researchers collecting data should have priority when it comes to analysing and presenting results – otherwise academics could be put in the unfair situation of spending years meticulously collecting data, only to see somebody else snatch the credit for the analysis.
A final point, which I've argued before, is that an open access policy to data needs to have a proper infrastructure and support system behind it, to manage archiving while scientists get on with their work unhindered.
On science, Ukip is dire, with no credibility in the scientific community and candidates who have a demonstrably poor grasp of basic scientific principles, which perhaps explains its general disarray and flip-flopping in areas such as health.
Ukip is the only significant party to support homeopathy, and the only party apart from the BNP still in denial over climate change. The appointment of Viscount Monckton as a science spokesman adds to the air of a party of old British eccentrics.
To view the original CLICK HERE
or on Junius CLICK HERE
The poor man is clever, humerous informed and quite clearly the type of grade A nutter from whom you wouldn't trust the reading of a clock! Great fun and very clubbable he may be, tennacious and very determined but all the same he has the same levels of credibility as the likes of Croucher, Denny, McGough, Farage, Skeptyk and their ilk poor sad NUTTER
Well YOU decide:
Toodle Pip Old Bean (has bean?)
The barking braying band of untrustworthy fools in UKIP's leadership must be so pleased to have another barking mad drinking chum and with title and false credentials he will fit in with the Butt of many a fake relationship David Bannerman, well until they cart him off to prison with Stuart Agnew and Peter Reeve for false accounting and stealing tax payer's money - it wil;l take a while but think how long it took to have Tom Wise and his assistant Lindsay Jenkins in Court for just the same crime and for criminal collusion as per their signatures on the instruments of fraud - Lindsay Jenkins was fortunate and got away with it despite the clear evidence CLICK HERE
Pictures 10, 11 & 12 particularly!
Tom Wise as the senior partner in this crime got 2 years and they let Lindsay off.
It is my personal opinion that Tom Wise was too stupid to have been competent to orchestrate this crime and would have needed help BESIDES just Lindsay's signature on the instrument of fraud - if it was not who was the third criminal? Was it Farage and that was why Tom gave him £5,000 to settle a personal debt? was that why Farage was in such a state on the day he was called to be a witness worried his part in the crime and the stolen money he still had might come to light.
Then as ever we have the malign hand of UKIP's village idiot and central liar who can't pay his legal bills having dragged UKIP into a clear and unequivocal debt to me of £12,500 which they will pay in the end (unless of course they go bankrupt next Week when found guilty yet again and in debt for about £1.2 Million due to utter dishonesty and crass stupidity on the part of Andrew Smith & Nigel Farage principally and the dribbling bufoon of a pretend solicitor Michael Zucherman - WILL they act honourably and pay the bill they PERSONALLY incurred!
Now we have the spectacle of Mark Croucher as media manager and PR boss of the racist, anti Jewish pro EU membership, violent and murderous criminals of UKIP's EFD, having worked so hard with Farage to raise the profile of The BNP to get them elected and now they are in parliament welcoming them as guests of UKIP's EFD - what a spectacle and the truth will out. Either Mark Croucher has been a racist, jew hating anti homosexual and violent holocaust denier or he is little more than a prostitute and will do anything for money.
What a revolting reflection on UKIP - but we shouldn't be surprised I guess with so many of them on the fiddle and stealing public money. Just look at liars like Nattrass and Coeman - 'Oh yes we know it is a vile group but it might damage our income if we leave', 'Oh yes I know they are vile but so am I but I won't be after the election I'll leave then', The bent copper Trevor Coleman even promised UKFirstParty when they were having their meetings in the flat in London that he would leave UKIP immediately after the election and it would be good to start the new Party with him as an MEP.
OK so you may not WANT to believe me and although it is probable Bruce Lawson, Martin Hasslam, Peter Cole and Trevor Coleman would lie and deny it I wonder if Petrina Holdsworth, Dell Young, David Abbott, Eric Edmond, John West, Andrew Belobaba and John Petley would!
Just one final leap of subject - do you think I should sue Mark Croucher in association with Skeptyk as I gather they have nicked a pic off this blog and put it on theirs - well of course I shouldn't the internet functions on the basis of honourable people unlike Croucher, UKIP, Clive Page and UKIP's sordid corrupt world of underhand and cowardly bullying - of course you can use the ID card of John west you nicked with the line across the face from our scanner! Did you want a copy of his letter of appointment as well - just let me know and I'll mail it over. That is how PUBLICITY pictures work - not by acting like a common theif and extortionist seeding the internet with unidentifiable pictures and then trying to steal £120,000 for the use of a UKIP publicity snap! You really are filth aren't you UKIP - now you lack the honour, integrity or fundamental morality to pay the bills you incurred when your dishonesty and bullying went wrong.
UKIP is clearly beneath contempt and who the hell would want low lifes and trash like this in Westminster - no wonder their outgoing leader was such a dishonest and incompetent squirt of a man and they now have a Grade A liar and fraud as deputy Leader.
I just realised that could go for Farage and Bannerman or Pearson and Bannerman or Pearson and Monkton or Bannerman and Monkton with equal alacrity!
Well on the 7th. the present bunch of corrupt pond life that are UKIP will have been in office for exactly a year and the day after they will celebrate with yet another apearance in Court with a verdict which could close them down on Thursday what of the £300,000 they borrowed? What of the money Agnew and Bannerman stole, what of the money laundering by Pearson, Farage and Agnew? What of the 5 outstanding enquiries awaiting passing to the British Police?
And now UKIP are firmly linked with The BNP in the public record having invited them to their book launch far more firmly linked as it was they who invited them whereas the photographs that duplicitous liar Michael McGough took of John West talking to a Veritas Candidate on election night were much parade by the filth in UKIP like Skeptic, McGough, croucher and Denny as PROOF John West was associated with the BNP and was he planniong on joining them - do you REALLY believe these sort of bullying tactics of the UKIP lynch Mob against one man who stood up and pointed out corruption did anything but catastrophic harm to UKIP?
Just as the vile lies and corruption of the foul mouthed slut Annabell Fuller in her evil bullying by trying to get revenge by posting a confidential clip of John West on the internet similarly to the filth who took a moment of fun in an out take from a video Nikki Sinclaire was making and due to a corrupt, vile and underhand little creep of a man John Ison her office gofer bribed with status betrayed her trust and supplied it to dishonestly and corruptly permit UKIP to try to damage Nikki Sinclaire UKIP's 3rd. largest donor in the quarter that she was lied to and about in betrayal by that pompose ill mannered little shit of a low life who befouls the House of Lords Malcolm Pearson of the scottish bad lands of Perth - a man who has failed all his life beyond the MONEY his FATHER made and bought his sordid and deceitful runt of a son a life style with, no wonder he feels at home with pond life like Farage and idiots and fraudsters from Bannerman, Agnew, Andreasen and Monkton - LIARS & CHEATS to a man!
Do you think filth like Douglas Denny with their malicious fabrications and fantasies trash like the serial failure and low life croucher, the odious likes of the liar Annabell Fuller, David Lott, Jim Carver, John Moran, christopher Gill, Micklethwaite and the rest of the manure heap of UKIP rigging and tampering with elections loitering in public toilets to spread malice and lies - do you really believe such people are or were ever fit for office?
Any office? Would you trust them in the Janitors office in a public toilets at a motorway service station - would it be wise?
INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
Reclaim YOUR Future & GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate)
LEAVE-THE-EU to Reclaim YOUR Future &
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK